A Failure of Leadership - MADACC Operations Committee Meeting January 2013

This is the seventh installment in a series of ten blogs outlining current issues and problems at Milwaukee Area Domestic Animal Control Commission (MADACC).

Yesterday was the monthly Operations Committee meeting at Milwaukee Area Domestic Animal Control Commission (MADACC). The MADACC board of directors is made up of one member from each of the nineteen municipalities of Milwaukee County that MADACC serves. The Operations Committee is comprised of six of these board members. They meet on the third Tuesday of every month at 1 p.m . at MADACC. These meetings are open to the public and I encourage you to attend if you are concerned about the welfare of Milwaukee County's animals.

I have posted the December statistics  and transfer numbers above. As suspected, transfers were down substantially in December 2012 as compared to December 2011. The number of animals killed in December was up from the same period last year. In total MADACC killed 5357 animals in 2012, including 6 birds, 3514 cats, 1783 dogs and 54 other animals.

Over thirty people attended yesterday's meeting and several spoke about their concerns. Thank you to the following people for your heartfelt and compelling testimonies:

Marissa Kraft, MADACC supporter, Milwaukee Animal Alliance
Cindi Ashbeck, Milwaukee Animal Welfare Examiner
Susan Taney, Lost Dogs of Wisconsin
Tammy Rizer, Milwaukee Animal Alliance
Clodagh Mc Guiness, MADACC volunteer
Nancy Annaromao, Milwaukee Animal Alliance, Remember Me Ranch
Shannon Cummings, Milwaukee Animal Alliance

The committee did not respond to this month's or last month's concerns, or the month before's concerns. The concerns are stacking up with no end in sight. When asked at the end of the meeting when some answers might be expected; Ron Hayward, president of the board, guaranteed that by next month's meeting the issues would be addressed. But Paul Ziehler of West Allis immediately interjected and said that it might be 30 to 60 days. When I asked how the issues would be addressed: would it be email, or newsletter or on the website? Paul said he didn't have an answer. Hmm... They can't even answer when or how they will have an answer. It's so sad, it's almost funny.

Ron Hayward, Village President of West Allis,  promised me at the board meeting on November 16th that he would get his email fixed (apparently it was broken?) and start responding to emails. He has not responded to a single email that I have sent since. I'm not sure how a Village President can function with a broken email account. But it is a very convenient way to put your head in the sand and ignore concerns.

So another month goes by with almost another 300 animals per month being killed. Not euthanized. Killed.

Euthanasia is by definition: the merciful taking of life of a hopelessly ill pet, the kind of act a loving pet owner shows when a pet's suffering can't be helped anymore.  Population control killing is NOT EUTHANASIA, as there is nothing merciful about it.  It's a public policy failure and an illustration that the community's sheltering organizations have not yet adopted the programs and policies that make it unnecessary.

 "Since we know that communities can save all their healthy and treatable pets, and we know how, there really is not excuse not to - although poorly managed public and private shelters seem to have no shortage of such excuses."  - Christie Keith

So let's lose the sugar coating, folks.  It is killing, it is not euthanasia.  Call it what it is. And have the courage to say it and own up to it.

The volunteer coordinator, Jessica Huber, announced that she was going to embark on a humane education program at a local school. A noble cause for a well-organized and funded shelter with a strong infrastructure. But a waste of time and money for a municipal shelter like MADACC that needs a volunteer coordinator that is focused on saving the lives of shelter animals RIGHT NOW, not with elementary school children where the effects won't be seen for years.

Earlier this month, Kelly Herbold of the Milwaukee Animal Alliance tried to set up a meeting with a few people from her group and John MacDowell to talk about how MAA can help be part of the solution.

Here is the email string:

 Kelly Herbold: 
We would like to start some ongoing conversations about maximizing MADACC's potential, and how Milwaukee Animal Alliance can contribute to that. I understand you may be concerned with who 'we' is.. 

J.L. McDowell: 
Ms. Herbold, 
You misunderstood. I have to have some idea of the specifics of what you would like to discuss as I must set aside a given amount of time. The second part of my statement about the “we” referred to number of individuals not who they are. Show up with you entire posse and it will likely be a very, very short meeting.

Last, show up prepared to speak plain English. Patience, especially with “in” phrases like “maximizing potential” is not one of my strong suits.

I am normally here till around 730 to 830 PM.  My day normally starts to slow a bit by around 6 or 630 PM so  I would suggest that you make plans to show up around that time. Send me several dates on or after the 11^th. and I will get back to you with one of those. 

Kelly Herbold:  It will be me, Amanda Wenzel and Tony DeStafanis. Does the 25th at  6pm work? 

J.L. McDowell: The 25^th. at 6 is fine. However,  come alone I will not meet with the other two. 

Not only unprofessional, but downright creepy. And this folks, is what your tax dollars is funding. A failure of leadership by the management and board of directors of MADACC to address and correct the issues brought forth by concerned citizens. Citizens who care enough about their community's animals to take time off in the middle of a work day to attend a meeting for a cause they are passionate about. Citizens who want to be part of the solution.

I want to end with one of my favorite sayings:

Killing is not a "necessary evil".  It is just plain evil. 

We know how to end the killing. It is time for the board and management of MADACC to step up and be leaders  or step down and get out of the way.

If you are concerned about the failure of leadership at MADACC that has resulted in the deaths of over 5000 animals in 2012 I urge you to attend the monthly meetings and to write or call the following Operations Committee members and your elected officials. Thank you.

Ron Hayward, West Milwaukee, President: ronald.hayward@westmilwaukee.org
Susan Robertson, Fox Point, Vice President (leaving soon for another position)
Don Schaewe, Milwaukee: dschae@milwaukee.gov
Paul Ziehler, West Allis: pziehler@ci.west-allis.wi.us
Michael Weber, Hales Corner: mweber@halescorners.org
Eric Pearson, Milwaukee: epears@milwaukee.gov
Derik Summerfield, Wauwatosa (absent): dsummerfield@wauwatosa.net

Also attending the operating committee meeting were the following MADACC staff members:

John McDowell - Interim Executive Director: jlmac2@madacc.com
Dr. Gutting - Veterinarian
Laura Proeber - Office Manager
Jessica Huber - Volunteer Coordinator

Shortcomings at MADACC - Dog Socialization and Behavior Evaluations

This is the sixth installment in a series of ten blogs outlining current issues and problems at Milwaukee Area Domestic Animal Control Commission (MADACC).  I am going to focus on the inconsistencies of the dog walking, evaluation and socialization program.

As you can see in the chart above, MADACC  killed 1652 dogs through November 30, 2012. This does not include those that were dead on arrival, died in their kennel, or were euthanized at their owner's request. There is a strong likelihood, based on other shelters around the country, that over 90% of these 1652 dogs were healthy or easily treatable, friendly, adoptable dogs.

At a well-functioning animal shelter, these dogs would either be reclaimed by their owners, or if unclaimed, put up for adoption or transferred out after their seven-day stray hold expired. The dogs would be evaluated to determine which type of home they were best suited for, and volunteers would be allowed to socialize, walk and train the dogs while they were awaiting transfer or adoption.

As a nation, we are adopting more dogs than ever before. More people than ever are choosing the adoption option, and this is clearly seen in statistics from around the country. In fact, over 23,000,000 Americans will acquire a new pet each year. Many of these 23,000,000 will go to their local animal shelter to adopt. Nationally, we are killing between 3 to 4 million animals per year. So you can see, that it is not a problem of "pet overpopulation" like many people like to claim. "Pet overpopulation" is an excuse used by shelter management and boards of directors to defend the killing and hide their inadequacies at marketing and efficient use of their staff, volunteers and resources. If you are still unclear about this please read this article. 

Dogs that have had the opportunity to be walked and socialized by volunteers have a much better chance at adoption than those that have been left in their kennel for days on end with little to no human interaction.

MADACC's problems lie in the huge inconsistencies in their volunteer dog walking and socialization program.  Dog walking is one of the easiest volunteer positions to fill. Animal lovers, with or without their own dogs; enjoy coming to a clean, well-run shelter to spend an hour or so interacting with the dogs and making a difference in their lives. They are thrilled when one of their favorites is adopted and they will work hard to do everything possible to improve the "adoptability" of a dog, including training and marketing the dog.

But MADACC is not a well-run shelter. I have been watching this for several months and there is no rhyme nor reason to MADACC's dog walking program. The volunteers are asking for more dogs to walk and market; and even though MADACC claims they are at or near capacity, there are times when there are only 2 or 3 dogs on the walk list.

Elmbrook Humane Society and Wisconsin Humane Society graciously send a trained, experienced evaluator to MADACC several times a week. This is called the MAX (Madacc Adoption Express) Evaluation program and was designed to fast-track the animals out of MADACC when their stray hold is up. When the dog receives a good evaluation and has finished stray hold, they should be allowed to be walked. But often times, they're not. Or if they are, they are re-evaluated by  MADACC staff who have no formal training in behavior evaluations. The previous shelter manager was said to "evaluate" dogs by rattling the kennel bars. If the dog showed any sign of fear - it was a death sentence.

The MAX evaluations are often disregarded or replaced by MADACC's evaluations - preventing the dog from being walked, socialized, transferred and adopted.

When a concerned citizen asked the Interim Executive Director, John MacDowell, about the procedure for evaluating dogs at MADACC, this was his response:

YOUR REQUEST: 1. Behavioral evaluations procedures: process for selecting
which animals receive them/when are they performed/what Madacc staff members
performs them/ what credentials and training does Madacc require of the
evaluator.

RESPONSE:. I have carefully considered this request, I have reviewed the
records of which I am the custodian, and I have not located a document that
appears to be responsive to this request in my files. This is not a denial,
it is simply an advisory to you that 1 have not located such a document, and
therefore I will be taking no further action.


Here is a recent example of this lack of evaluation procedure that has resulted in the death of a dog.  I am paraphrasing it from an email:

Dog A254572, a 3 year old male. Suitable for a home with children 6  to 10 years old. Knows how to sit, walks excellent on a leash. Gentle, mellow and easy to take food and treats away. Responds to praise and petting. Settles and chews on a toy. 

This dog, A254572, came into MADACC on December 10th. He had an excellent MAX evaluation, but when I went to look him up on the site, he did not have an intake picture.  I emailed the vet techs to get it and they emailed me back his photo... but never uploaded it to the site.  Seriously, who is going to notice a dog without a photo?  What if he had owners?  Well, it gets even worse.  I had a couple of rescues potentially interested in him.  One rescue had emailed  about him and the techs said no one had expressed interest.  The rescue went to evaluate him on December 31 but MADACC was closed to rescues (without notice).  They were also closed on January 1. The rescue planned to go see him today, January 2, but then last night they noticed he was no longer on the transfer list.  They emailed MADACC to find out what happened to him and received the reply "this dog failed his evaluation and was euthanized."  As soon as I heard that today, I emailed the vet techs to find out if MADACC does their own evaluations anymore, because I heard they don't.  Their reply "No we don't do evals anymore."  So, I ask you.... what eval did he fail??? His MAX evaluation was flawless.  I just sent an email to the techs inquiring about what happened to him. The response "We are not at liberty to say."

Guidelines set out in the AVSMA Guidelines for Standards of Care in Animal Shelters (2010) clearly states: "Animals should receive some type of positive social interaction outside of the activities of feeding and cleaning on a daily basis (eg. walking, playing, groomin, petting, etc.)  Training programs for dogs and cats also serve as an important source of stimulation and social contact.  For dogs, such training has been shown to increase chances for re-homing." You can read the entire set of guidelines by clicking this link. 

The UC Davis Report that was published in 2011 as an independent evaluation of MADACC reported the following problems:

• A number of dogs appeared stressed particularly during cleaning.
• Significant causes of stress at MADACC include: lack of dry resting areas since both beds and floors were often wet post-cleaning, being sprayed with water during cleaning, inadequate access to food, limited positive social interaction with people, noise, proximity to other stressed dogs, and living (sleeping, eating, resting) on surfaces contaminated with feces.
• Noise levels due to barking were often unacceptably high causing stress in dogs and staff.
• Dogs are not approved for walking in a consistent manner.
• Not all dogs past their stray hold had been evaluated for dog walking.

Recommendations include:

• Remove dogs that have been approved for walking after their stray hold from their kennels twice daily and walk them briefly outdoors, to allow them to eliminate.  This maintains dog's house training habits and makes an easier task of keeping the kennels clean.
• Provide dogs with positive human interaction for a minimum of 20 minutes per day.  This may include training, playing fetch, or walking.  Dogs are highly motivated to gain human social interaction.
• Provide dogs with physical exercise and "quiet time" away from the kennels. Aerobic exercise can reduce anxiety and stress. In addition, "quiet time", where the dogs are allowed to sit with a person and RELAX, may be beneficial in reducing stress, especially with fearful and anxious dogs.
• Provide dogs with feeding enrichment such as food stuff Kong toys or Kibble Nibble dog toys filled with dog food, and buckets outside their cage with dog food and treats in them so that visitors can provide dogs with positive social interaction by giving them treats when they are well behaved (sitting or standing quietly, not barking or jumping). 

From the contract that MADACC holds with the 19 municipalities of Milwaukee County:

Scope and Extent of Services, Exhibit C reads:
1. (c) Comply with State law with regard to shelter and care: will use euthanasia only as a last resort.

MADACC is currently not using euthanasia as a last resort and thereby not fulfilling its contract. They are using it as a first resort, instead of implementing the suggestions and recommendations that have been made to them in the UC Davis Report. They are not even meeting the minimum guidelines set out in the ASVMA Shelter Guidelines.

If you are a resident of Milwaukee County and are concerned about how your tax dollars are being spent and how your community's animals are being treated I suggest that you contact your alderman or elected official.  Thank you for caring.